We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
https://academic.oup.com/nar/advance-article/doi/10.1093/nar/gkab1129/6439677?s=09#.YaQgdEN8j8A.twitter
Questions are
A) also good for cDNA Nanopore reads?
B) so large difference to featurecounts with long read option that we are currently using?
Also minor, bc rnaflow was mainly intended for short read data and long read support is more of an addon
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
https://academic.oup.com/nar/advance-article/doi/10.1093/nar/gkab1129/6439677?s=09#.YaQgdEN8j8A.twitter
Questions are
A) also good for cDNA Nanopore reads?
B) so large difference to featurecounts with long read option that we are currently using?
Also minor, bc rnaflow was mainly intended for short read data and long read support is more of an addon
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: