New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Explicitly: no single person should ever have veto power on a change. #3

Open

phadej opened this issue Sep 12, 2020 · 1 comment

phadej commented Sep 12, 2020

In https://wiki.haskell.org/Library_submissions#Controversial_decisions

This is not retained in

Ideally, the committee reaches consensus, as determined by the secretary or the shepherd. If consensus is elusive, then we vote, with the chair retaining veto power.

GHC-committee is different, there are Simons. No CLC member should IMO have veto power.

Contributor

chessai commented Sep 22, 2020

This is a good point. I was thinking about that when doing the "translation" of the GHC document to the CLC document.

I agree

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment