We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
1.8.1
Just a big number of resources defined (> 100k)
With DeepCopy in remote state's WriteState function, I get ~1 resource/sec on a plan with 300k object:
DeepCopy
WriteState
Tue Apr 30 13:40:21 CEST 2024 161 databricks_notebook Tue Apr 30 13:45:21 CEST 2024 436 databricks_notebook Tue Apr 30 13:50:22 CEST 2024 709 databricks_notebook Tue Apr 30 13:55:22 CEST 2024 996 databricks_notebook
Without it, I'm getting close to 2 resources/second:
Tue Apr 30 15:00:27 CEST 2024 191 databricks_notebook Tue Apr 30 15:05:30 CEST 2024 708 databricks_notebook Tue Apr 30 15:10:31 CEST 2024 1218 databricks_notebook Tue Apr 30 15:15:31 CEST 2024 1732 databricks_notebook
Performance doesn't degrade
Performance degrades with the number of resources in plan
just normal usage with plan/apply.
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Terraform Version
Terraform Configuration Files
Just a big number of resources defined (> 100k)
Debug Output
With
DeepCopyin remote state'sWriteStatefunction, I get ~1 resource/sec on a plan with 300k object:Without it, I'm getting close to 2 resources/second:
Expected Behavior
Performance doesn't degrade
Actual Behavior
Performance degrades with the number of resources in plan
Steps to Reproduce
just normal usage with plan/apply.
Additional Context
No response
References
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: