Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ENHANCEMENT] improve the stability of Harvester CSI Driver #5801

Open
Vicente-Cheng opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

[ENHANCEMENT] improve the stability of Harvester CSI Driver #5801

Vicente-Cheng opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/csi-driver Harvester CSI for guest cluster Epic kind/enhancement Issues that improve or augment existing functionality require/investigate
Milestone

Comments

@Vicente-Cheng
Copy link
Contributor

Vicente-Cheng commented May 14, 2024

Is your enhancement related to a problem? Please describe.
After some discussion with @WebberHuang1118, we thought Harvester CSI driver had various straightforward mechanisms
We should make it more stable and robust.

Describe the solution you'd like
Check the Harvester CSI Driver detail and refine it.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context
TBD

@Vicente-Cheng Vicente-Cheng added kind/enhancement Issues that improve or augment existing functionality area/csi-driver Harvester CSI for guest cluster labels May 14, 2024
@Vicente-Cheng Vicente-Cheng added this to the v1.4.0 milestone May 14, 2024
@bk201
Copy link
Member

bk201 commented May 14, 2024

Need concrete action items

@Vicente-Cheng
Copy link
Contributor Author

Need concrete action items

Update some items, we are investigating more.

@innobead
Copy link

Add investigation label first, as we need more context for this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/csi-driver Harvester CSI for guest cluster Epic kind/enhancement Issues that improve or augment existing functionality require/investigate
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants