You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
However, in my case I had the measurement moments_normalized in my table. This measurement had NaN values for each label (see screenshot). This means, all rows were removed and the feature_correlation_matrix only contained NaN values.
Maybe in some cases, it would make more sense to remove the column and not the row. But I am not sure if this would still be good scientific practice.
Best,
Mara
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, before computing the
feature_correlation_matrix
all rows with NaN values are removed (see documentation and code)napari-accelerated-pixel-and-object-classification/napari_accelerated_pixel_and_object_classification/_custom_table_row_classifier.py
Line 264 in 68da4c9
However, in my case I had the measurement
moments_normalized
in my table. This measurement had NaN values for each label (see screenshot). This means, all rows were removed and thefeature_correlation_matrix
only contained NaN values.Maybe in some cases, it would make more sense to remove the column and not the row. But I am not sure if this would still be good scientific practice.
Best,
Mara
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: