When I use faust -a <my.cpp> the <<includeclass>> and <<includeInstrinsic>> tags are not removed

[bassmanitram]

If I use a "null" architecture as shown in the help, these two tags DO not appear in the generated C++. But when I use my own architecture cpp file, they remain in the generated source. Any ideas what I might be doing wrong?

[sletz]

Why do you mean by a "null" architecture?

[bassmanitram]

https://faustdoc.grame.fr/manual/architectures/#minimal-structure-of-an-architecture-file

…

On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 2:41 PM Stéphane Letz ***@***.***> wrote: Why do you mean by *a "null" architecture*? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1013 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADAKLWQTSCHIWFQDSJLQTXLZAIX6PAVCNFSM6AAAAABHDUONKWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43SRDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHM4TEOJVGE4TO> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[sletz]

Than I guess your architecture file is incorrect: can you share it ?

[bassmanitram]

(Asking the owner of the architecture if I can - however, I think I can "obfuscate" the proprietary stuff anyway ...)

[bassmanitram]

headless.cpp.TXT

Suitably sanitized to CMA (and renamed with a .TXT suffix to get it past GitHub's file-type filter - to use it, remove the .TXT)

[sletz]

This one works :
arch3.cpp.txt

I simply created a new one, then added:

<<includeIntrinsic>>

<<includeclass>>

Then pasted your code.

(no idea what happened, could not see problematic hidden character or what ever...)

[bassmanitram]

LOL - It was DOS line breaks - I compared yours to mine and that was the difference. Changed them all to unix 0x0A and all works. Thanks so much for the help!

[sletz]

OK, thanks.