-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 174
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FixMatch with MixUp #64
Comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Thanks for the great research. Can I ask you a question? The paper said "One may replace strong augmentation in FixMatch modality-agnostic augmentation strategies, such as MixUp". I can't understand this part well. I am curious about the specific way MixUp was used in FixMatch.
For example, If there are two unlabeled data, FixMatch mixes up two data with 0.4:0.6 ratio. And FixMatch gives consistency loss between Pseudo-label and prediction. So, Ideal weakly Augmented model prediction should be [..., 0.4, 0.6, ...]. Am I right? Thanks for reading.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: