Closing old PRs
#9441
Replies: 2 comments 6 replies
-
Setting them to a draft is sufficient, then they are not in the normal flow. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
6 replies
-
We could use "abandoned" maybe?
…On Sat, 7 Aug 2021 at 04:36, Gerhard Olsson ***@***.***> wrote:
is:unmerged can be used
https://github.com/gitextensions/gitextensions/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aunmerged+is%3Aclosed
However, the reason for closing the PR is unknown so such a label could
make sense.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#9441 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABBTEXT2SHU6BDMBUUQXKYDT3QTSRANCNFSM5BTMXGUA>
.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hey, I have seen a lot of PR that are old and not really worked on. I think we should close them to clean the Pull requests section a little bit. The branches would stay.
I could do that, by going through them and making a mention for @RussKie or some other maintainer.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions