We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This issue was created automatically with bugzilla2github
Date: 2016-12-05T16:25:39+01:00 From: Lene Antonsen <<lene.antonsen>> To: Maja Lisa Kappfjell <<maja.l.kappfjell>> CC: lene.antonsen, sjur.n.moshagen, thomas.omma, trond.trosterud
Last updated: 2016-12-09T10:32:47+01:00
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Date: 2016-12-05 16:25:39 +0100 From: Lene Antonsen <<lene.antonsen>>
Denne har vi diskutert tidligere:
I sma-FST har propernouns både +Cmp/SgNom og +Cmp/SgGen stier fra samme form, som i dette leksikonet (dette gjelder alle leksikonene):
LEXICON ERVASTI +Sg: INAME_ODD_SG ; +Sg+Nom:%>i FINAL1 ; +Cmp/SgNom:%>i RHyph ; ! ERVASTI-muorra, Ervasti-dállu etc. RHyph er Cmp. +Cmp/SgGen:%>i RHyph ;
Dette gir doble analyser til alle propernouns med Hyph, slik:
Røros-saemiej Røros-saemiej Røros+N+Prop+Sem/Plc+Cmp/SgGen+Cmp-#saemie+N+Pl+Gen Røros-saemiej Røros+N+Prop+Sem/Plc+Cmp/SgNom+Cmp-#saemie+N+Pl+Gen
Røros er ikke genitivform.
To alternativer:
Sorry, something went wrong.
Date: 2016-12-09 10:32:47 +0100 From: Maja Lisa Kappfjell <<maja.l.kappfjell>>
ok.
No branches or pull requests
This issue was created automatically with bugzilla2github
Bugzilla Bug 2288
Date: 2016-12-05T16:25:39+01:00
From: Lene Antonsen <<lene.antonsen>>
To: Maja Lisa Kappfjell <<maja.l.kappfjell>>
CC: lene.antonsen, sjur.n.moshagen, thomas.omma, trond.trosterud
Last updated: 2016-12-09T10:32:47+01:00
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: