You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Agreed. Also on the Husky. They are overestimated currently. Even if its not a straight numerical comparison (aka system identification) just to scale it back to match basic driving experience would be worth it.
There's also a certain degree in uncertainty wrt. if Gazebo handles such
calculations properly. There's no proper tire model, just a friction model.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Prasenjit Mukherjee < [email protected]> wrote:
Agreed. Also on the Husky. They are overestimated currently. Even if its
not a straight numerical comparison (aka system identification) just to
scale it back to match basic driving experience would be worth it.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #3 (comment).
There needs to be some more rigorous comparisons made between simulated and real Grizzly, in order to verify the dynamic parameters.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: