Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Path to 1.0.1 #42

Open
4 of 6 tasks
rkosafo opened this issue Mar 21, 2019 · 4 comments
Open
4 of 6 tasks

Path to 1.0.1 #42

rkosafo opened this issue Mar 21, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@rkosafo
Copy link
Contributor

rkosafo commented Mar 21, 2019

This is to track issues/tasks on the path to 1.0.1.

  • Upgrade Rezoom to 1.0.1 (package not available)
  • Upgrade FParsec-Pipes to 1.1.1 (gives an error)
  • Test TSQL
  • Test Sqlite
  • Test Posgres
  • Fix error when select has only 1 field
@rkosafo
Copy link
Contributor Author

rkosafo commented Mar 21, 2019

@rspeele I get the error below when it was updated to FParsec-Pipes 1.1.1. FParsec-Pipes 1.1.1 works fine.

FileLoadException: Could not load file or assembly 'FParsecCS, Version=1.0.3.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' or one of its dependencies. A strongly-named assembly is required. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131044)

I'm suspecting it has something to do with A strongly-named assembly is required. Any idea if there is any difference between the libraries besides the version numbers. Could it be signing related?

@rspeele
Copy link
Collaborator

rspeele commented Mar 24, 2019

Haven't had much chance to look at this one, but I made a console app in .NET Framework and .NET Core referencing FParsec-Pipes and wasn't able to get the same problem to occur. Nothing changed between 1.1.0 and 1.1.1 other than this commit: rspeele/FParsec-Pipes@69b62b5

@rkosafo
Copy link
Contributor Author

rkosafo commented Mar 24, 2019

Is the library signed? Could that be a reason or vice versa?

@rspeele
Copy link
Collaborator

rspeele commented Mar 25, 2019 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants