-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FACIT -- Generalize ICRH effects #87
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
Comments
Of interest for @DanielFajardoJ |
This would be a good improvement for ICRH applications, thanks @cjperks7 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I can do this one too
Issue
The formula used in FACIT for the ICRH effects on poloidal asymmetry assumes just D(H) minority heating. Future fusion devices (SPARC) will use other schemes such as D(He3), D/T(He3).
Plan of action
In the original derivation by M. Reinke, they obtained a general expression and then specified it to D(H) which was grabbed for use it FACIT. Pretty straight forward to change that to account for other schemes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: