Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluate the usage of CernVM-FS #30

Open
frzb opened this issue Jan 11, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Evaluate the usage of CernVM-FS #30

frzb opened this issue Jan 11, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@frzb
Copy link
Owner

frzb commented Jan 11, 2021

CernVM-FSCernVM-FS could be useful to distribute software - in contrast to a conventional network filesystem it caches aggressively.

https://cvmfs.readthedocs.io

@frzb frzb added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 11, 2021
@lookfirst
Copy link

This is really interesting, I'd use something other than squid for the caching server though. I tried to use it once and it was a total pain in the a*s to setup and manage. There has to be something better and more modern out there.

The other issue to think about is that having a proxy server does also add some complexity to the system... another point of failure.

@frzb
Copy link
Owner Author

frzb commented Jan 16, 2021

I am as well not a big Squid fan boy.
I think for the evaluation a HTTP caching proxy is not necessary.
If it is necessary for a scaling production environment this decision should be based on identifying bottlenecks or room for improvement with more benefits than trade-offs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants