You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When requesting Corporation Customs Offices only Orbital Customs Offices are shown, and not the Customs Offices within Orbital Skyhooks. They should be included either here (makes most sense) or on the Structures endpoint.
Use case
Corporation and alliance leaders, third party apps, the unpaid IT nerds critical to the running of any large group.
We use first and third party tools to monitor our structures and ensure things like access and taxes are aligned. This is not easily done even in the ingame client (hundreds of clicks). This is already available for existing Customs Offices so seems like this was just missed when adding Orbital Skyhooks.
Authentication
Does this feature require a new scope, an existing scope, or no scope? E.g.:
Propose what an example return might look like. E.g.:
Should make no difference if its an Orbital Skyhooks or Customs Office. The only difference would be a wider reinforce_exit_end and reinforce_exit_start which would easily identify it as a Skyhook.
Thankyou for documenting this, this was raised with CCP and CSM day 4-5 of equinox. But i did not have skyhooks or pocos to show example returns for the data
Feature Request
When requesting Corporation Customs Offices only Orbital Customs Offices are shown, and not the Customs Offices within Orbital Skyhooks. They should be included either here (makes most sense) or on the Structures endpoint.
Use case
Corporation and alliance leaders, third party apps, the unpaid IT nerds critical to the running of any large group.
We use first and third party tools to monitor our structures and ensure things like access and taxes are aligned. This is not easily done even in the ingame client (hundreds of clicks). This is already available for existing Customs Offices so seems like this was just missed when adding Orbital Skyhooks.
Authentication
Does this feature require a new scope, an existing scope, or no scope? E.g.:
Existing scope
esi-planets.read_customs_offices.v1
Example return
Propose what an example return might look like. E.g.:
Should make no difference if its an Orbital Skyhooks or Customs Office. The only difference would be a wider
reinforce_exit_end
andreinforce_exit_start
which would easily identify it as a Skyhook.Checklist
Check all boxes that apply to this issue:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: