We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In case of transaction granularity usage we need index that would provide us txnum by only hash (now we only have txhash->blocknum from e2)
There are some variants:
It would provide us a way to implement #12343 etc
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
JkLondon
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Rationale
In case of transaction granularity usage we need index that would provide us txnum by only hash (now we only have txhash->blocknum from e2)
Implementation
There are some variants:
It would provide us a way to implement #12343 etc
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: