You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Writing down the protocol in terms of separate rounds is flexible, but a little unwieldy. Can we provide a way to write protocols as a single function, without splitting it into Round types? Kind of like in round-based.
This probably won't support all the functionality Rounds do, so the question is: what can we support? Is it a useful subset? Can it be linked to the Round-based description so that it's easy to prototype a protocol as a single function and later switch to Rounds?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Writing down the protocol in terms of separate rounds is flexible, but a little unwieldy. Can we provide a way to write protocols as a single function, without splitting it into Round types? Kind of like in
round-based
.This probably won't support all the functionality
Rounds
do, so the question is: what can we support? Is it a useful subset? Can it be linked to theRound
-based description so that it's easy to prototype a protocol as a single function and later switch toRound
s?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: