You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The ZX0 project says that ZX7 is superseded by ZX0. https://github.com/einar-saukas/ZX0
Also, a variant ZX1 exists.
Would it be interesting to add those in the comparison list and the pareto graph?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
To be honest, quite a few compressors on our diagram are superseded by ZX0. It is difficult to update the diagram at this moment because I am helping to optimize Z80 decompressors for ZX0 and ZX1. I did some preliminary tests for ZX0, you can see the results of these tests here: https://www.cpcwiki.eu/forum/programming/new-cruncher-zx0/msg197727/#msg197727
These tests demonstrate that ZX0 is an excellent compression format, truly modern and, in fact, the best that I know in its own category.
Once the Z80 decompressors settle a little, I will prepare a new diagram featuring both ZX0 and ZX1. From what I know, ZX0 is a little faster than e.g. MegaLZ, i.e. below 3*LDIR. ZX1 is quoted by Einar as being 15% faster, which should take it, approximately, into LZSA2-like territory, but I have not done tests to confirm it.
The ZX0 project says that ZX7 is superseded by ZX0.
https://github.com/einar-saukas/ZX0
Also, a variant ZX1 exists.
Would it be interesting to add those in the comparison list and the pareto graph?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: