👋 @Liao-js, thank you for contributing element-plus.

• You can comment with /label Components:[component_name] to add a label for which component you are working on.
• You may join our for staying tuned.

Hello @Liao-js, thank you for contributing to element-plus, please see our guideline to see how to make contribution

🧪 Playground Preview: https://element-plus.run/?pr=16739
Please comment the example via this playground if needed.

The functions of this PR overlap with those discussed in #16747. Directly exporting fields will give users more room to operate.

The functions of this PR overlap with those discussed in #16747. Directly exporting fields will give users more room to operate.

ok, what do you need me to do?

directly exporting fields will give users more room to operate，but I think this does not conflict with pr. The functions is more suitable for users who use dynamic forms. It can facilitate users to directly obtain the value of the corresponding structure for direct submission without additional processing of propString.

@tolking Do you think this new method in PR is necessary? IMO, it should be enough to directly export fields and let users handle it themselves.

directly exporting fields will give users more room to operate，but I think this does not conflict with pr. The functions is more suitable for users who use dynamic forms. It can facilitate users to directly obtain the value of the corresponding structure for direct submission without additional processing of propString.

Yes, you have a point. But this is the first time I've seen a need in this area, and this method doesn't seem to be used frequently. I don't know if we should add it, maybe more people should be consulted.

IMO, It would be better for users to implement this special requirement by themselves.

The newly added code may be redundant for most people.

IMO, This method leans more towards the business level, Not every user needs to submit data of type 'Record<string, any>', It may also be of other types, such as <label: string, value: any>[], So I think it's better to exporting fields and let users handle the data on their own.

在我看来，这个方法更偏向于业务层面，并不是每个用户所需要提交的数据都是Record<string, any>类型的，也可能是其他类型，例如<label: string, value: any>[]，所以我认为暴露出fileds字段让用户自行处理数据更好一些。

I agree with your point of view, I did not consider it comprehensively enough.I will close this PR.