Adjust the text in the info i for the access ways

[AndyDaniel1]

has to be refined

[anneweber]

• keep only first sentence and lower part:
  
  
• however, it should be checked with the linked website whether the short descriptions for each access way are appropriate/correct/complete.
• afterwards issue https://github.com/dzhw/Datenpaketdokumentation/issues/51 should be processed

[ewolf47]

@AndyDaniel1 @anneweber

Regarding checking the short descriptions of the respective access ways. I'm not really into it technically. So here are a few things that I have noticed. Any changes to the wording should finally be formulated by you, so I can change it in the code:

CUF: Download
So far it says "nur für Lehrzwecke". However, the linked list also includes seminar papers, term papers, Bachelor's/Master's theses, dissertations/habilitations and scientific articles in specialist journals/research projects. My suggestion: Perhaps it should be reworded like this: "nur für Lehr- und Forschungszwecke"
Under "Statistische Maßnahmen", "sehr hoch" is mentioned in the linked list. In comparison, SUF: Download is only classified as "hoch". However, the info window currently lists "stärkerer statistischer Anonymisierungsgrad" for both access ways. My suggestion: For CUF: Download "sehr hoher statistischer Anonymisierungsgrad" and for SUF: Download "hoher statistischer Anonymisierungsgrad".

SUF: Download
So far, the info window does not list the purposes for which the data may be used. The linked list is identical to the CUF: Download list except for "Wissenschaftliche Lehre und Übungszwecke". I don't know whether this is relevant at all, or whether this information has been deliberately omitted. My suggestion would be to add the following sentence to the info window: "nur für Forschungszwecke"

SUF: Remote desktop
analogous to SUF-Download

SUF: On-Site
analogous to SUF-Download

[AndyDaniel1]

Kudos for thinking about the content here too! You have identified some important points here we missed!

CUF: Download
Theses are regarded as teaching purposes, thus the purpose is correct for this. BUT we should remove dissertations/habilitations and scientific articles in specialist journals/research projects from the list.

Good suggestion:

For CUF: Download "sehr hoher statistischer Anonymisierungsgrad" and for SUF: Download "hoher statistischer Anonymisierungsgrad".

SUF-Remote
Here it is vice versa compared to the CUF. The list should exclude bachelor theses and keep master theses (is also correct for CUF) dissertations/habilitations and scientific articles in specialist journals/research projects.

The current hint on the purposes should be completely removed here, as it could be that the the purposes are board. Instead we should include a hint on the respective field implemented in #3275 . en "Please check the approved uses on the data package detail page" de "Bitte prüfen Sie die erlaubten Nutzungszwecke auf der Datenpaketdetailseite"

SUF: On-Site
analogous to SUF-Download

Again! Thank you for the very good remarks!

[AndyDaniel1]

@ewolf47

[ewolf47]

@AndyDaniel1

BUT we should remove dissertations/habilitations and scientific articles in specialist journals/research projects from the list.

Do I understand correctly that we should edit the list on "https://www.fdz.dzhw.eu/de/datennutzung"? If so, should the following items be removed? (should @UteH decide on that?)

For the changes in the info modal on the MDM page, I have adapted the text as follows:

[AndyDaniel1]

@ewolf47 no we have to discuss this further. I will come back to this issue next week

[anneweber]

@AndyDaniel1 (@UteH ) Hier mein Vorschlag: