Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

image gtaug difference with pointaugmenting #24

Open
AndyYuan96 opened this issue Feb 4, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

image gtaug difference with pointaugmenting #24

AndyYuan96 opened this issue Feb 4, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@AndyYuan96
Copy link

Hi,I see in paper that you say: 'In this work, we follow previous studies [50, 7] and use a unified approach for GT-sampling', but after I reading the point-augmenting code and your code, I still find some difference between your unified approach and point-augmenting approach, for example, when generate image gtaug, you only keep one image gtaug for one 3d box, but point-augmenting keep 6 image gtaug in nuscenes, can I ask did your approach is better than Pointaugmenting.

@yanwei-li
Copy link
Member

Hi, sorry for the late reply. Could you please tell me the detailed code line? So, I can check it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants