You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We don't have to check metadata unless we modify the metadata somehow. Right now, it will just inherit the metadata from the LHS DO (I think, right)? We might want to think how we want to handle that in the future and make an issue for a future release.
One idea I had was, if each DO has a uuid (which they do now) we could store the provenance of the new DO, for example, that it was lhs_do.uuid + rhs_do.uuid, for example. In principle we could unroll everything all the way back to recover all metadata this way. But this can get pretty complicated pretty quickly. Let's just leave it as it is for now.
In terms of if we need more examples, just make sure that all the tests are described in the docs in words.
We may want to put in the docs that the new DO inherits metadata from the LHS DO or whatever it is.
One idea I had was, if each DO has a uuid (which they do now) we could store the provenance of the new DO, for example, that it was lhs_do.uuid + rhs_do.uuid, for example. In principle we could unroll everything all the way back to recover all metadata this way. But this can get pretty complicated pretty quickly. Let's just leave it as it is for now.
In terms of if we need more examples, just make sure that all the tests are described in the docs in words.
We may want to put in the docs that the new DO inherits metadata from the LHS DO or whatever it is.
Originally posted by @sbillinge in #248 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: