-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support of Deye SUN SG05LP1 #265
Comments
Hi @BoberMod, this warning is for existing users to be careful when they (for any reason) delete and re-adding back their device. So they don't add it with incorrect profile which could populate existing history with nonsensical data. If you as a new user do add device with profile which works but display incorrect data you can just delete it and remove history of the sensors using Developer tools -> STATISTICS -> Fix Issue on all entities which will delete it. List with supported devices contains those which are confirmed from users and I'm sure that the integration works for many more which are not listed. |
Can you show me reading using built-in ACTION in Developer tools of register number 274? |
Action:
|
Okay so there are bits for different modes (GM, BU, CH) which are not configurable using standard methods (inverter display). The only info I found about it was for different brand (but obviously the same device/HW):
Means that GM mode is selected. My questions are:
Can you try to set this configuration using HA? |
Those commits should fix it. 😉 |
Is it fixed in the latest release? |
Is your feature request related to a problem?
I have Deye SUN-6K-SG05LP1-EU 6KW inverter. Currently, it's not listed in supported devices.
Logger firmware:
LSW3_32U_5406_1.06
.Logger serial number: 2975*******
Describe the solution you'd like
I want to try the
deye_hybrid.yaml
config. As I understand it, it's a generic profile and can work with any Deye inverter. But according to message in wiki, I can't just choosedeye_hybrid.yaml
because if it's wrong, it will overwrite my settings:Is there a read-only mode to try?
Describe alternatives you've considered
I considered the original implementation of this integration by StephanJoubert and integration by kellerza.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: