-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
Death data is wrong on 6/26 for the San Francisco Bay Area counties #363
Comments
Well that's total garbage. Thanks @kengo-sony for the issue! A request: if you're using Cheers, looking into it! jz |
Correction, it was actually |
Should be fixed in #366. I'll launch it to prod and the data should be regenerated in at most a few days. |
Thanks again @kengo-sony ! jz |
Thanks for your quick fix @jzohrab ! 6/26 data looks good now. Yes, I will make sure to include the dateSources section when reporting a data issue. Thanks again! |
Sorry again, @jzohrab. I see another issue in Alameda County. I could be an side effect of the fix.
...
Here is the data source.
|
I’m seeing something similar with case counts, except it doesn’t go back to being a cumulative number: #370. I’m also seeing more deaths than cases for the following California counties:
and more recoveries than cases for the following counties:
and no cases for the following counties that have had cases:
|
#371 fixed some but not all of the issues in #363 (comment). |
Tested looks good in the "California County Coronavirus Reporting" Google Spreadsheet maintained by Harriet Rowan but the data I'm fetching from https://coronadatascraper.com/timeseries.csv.zip is still broken for Contra Costa County. Do you think this is due to caching or remaining issues with parsing? |
Here’s what timeseries-byLocation.json says for Contra Costa County in August:
137,460 matches what the spreadsheet shows for August 4 in Contra Costa County. The empty object for August 5 might be because the spreadsheet already shows data for some counties on August 5. The scraper only avoids returning a result if no county has reported data on a certain date: li/src/shared/sources/us/ca/mercury-news.js Lines 63 to 65 in e5f764d
|
Apologies for what may have been a false alarm. I agree that cases for Contra Costa County now look good. |
The COVID Atlas site still shows 15,500 deaths in Santa Clara County and similarly catastrophic spikes across the Bay Area on June 26, as originally reported above: One solution is to stand up alternative scrapers that will be preferred over the Mercury News source, such as #375 for Santa Clara County, #378 for Alameda County, and #379 in Marin County. |
As a followup to #363 (comment), San Mateo County and possibly others are showing an explicit 0 cases on recent days for which there’s no data, instead of undefined:
|
Yep I don't know why some are coded that way, it's incorrect. Thanks for catching it. |
San Francisco County
"2020-06-25": {
"cases": 3297,
"deaths": 48,
"tested": 129617,
"hospitalized_current": 47,
"icu_current": 17,
"growthFactor": 1.01
},
"2020-06-26": {
"cases": 3400,
"deaths": 4800,
"tested": 132575,
"hospitalized_current": 45,
"icu_current": 18,
"growthFactor": 1.03
},
"2020-06-27": {
"cases": 3468,
"deaths": 49,
"tested": 135170,
"hospitalized_current": 54,
"icu_current": 19,
"growthFactor": 1.02
},
Alameda County
{
"cases": 5382,
"deaths": 128,
"tested": 0,
"hospitalized": 0,
"recovered": 0,
"icu": 0,
"growthFactor": 1.02,
"date": "2020-06-25"
},
{
"cases": 5493,
"deaths": 13000,
"tested": 0,
"hospitalized": 0,
"recovered": 0,
"icu": 0,
"growthFactor": 1.02,
"date": "2020-06-26"
},
{
"cases": 5493,
"deaths": 130,
"tested": 0,
"hospitalized": 0,
"recovered": 0,
"icu": 0,
"growthFactor": 1,
"date": "2020-06-27"
},
Other counties shows wrong huge deaths number on 6/26 only.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: