You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We need more input from new contributors. Currently, we are relying more and more on a lot of internal and external tools to write our rules. Not everybody may know them, while they are so helpful to create better rules.
I think we should have something like a "Great tools for rule writers" page to bring the rule writing practices from the 2000s to the 2020s.
And maybe even end with a full-fledged "rule writing walkthrough" that strings all the tools together to create a sample rule (could be moved to a separate issue if we want to do that).
Proposed solution
At least, we could make a list of useful tools and links to them.
For example:
CRS-toolchain (would link to our own upcoming documentation page about the new regexp assembler)
Motivation
We need more input from new contributors. Currently, we are relying more and more on a lot of internal and external tools to write our rules. Not everybody may know them, while they are so helpful to create better rules.
I think we should have something like a "Great tools for rule writers" page to bring the rule writing practices from the 2000s to the 2020s.
And maybe even end with a full-fledged "rule writing walkthrough" that strings all the tools together to create a sample rule (could be moved to a separate issue if we want to do that).
Proposed solution
At least, we could make a list of useful tools and links to them.
For example:
At best we could have the list, and also create a 'walkthrough' for creating a rule that goes from:
Alternatives
Karel always just does a web search for 'execute postgres online'. But there's a bigger chance that people might give up.
Additional context
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: