-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Object Naming Norms for Picture Stimuli (Snodgrass & Vanderwart, 1980) #1385
Comments
Thanks, I gave you access to also add labels to the issues now. We should start by typing off the data into a spreadsheet. What you can also test, @alzkuc, is to use Transkribus for this task, since preprocessing may be facilitated. If you want to, let me know, so we tell you how to access it. |
I suggest to start from page 205, since we have a clear table there. With Transkribus, rating results can also be added. But one should check what they mean there. |
The images itself could be annotated with polygons when converting the image to a scan. But I would probably not do so directly now, until we know if we can every share the images (part can be reused, I guess, but probably not entirely). If you check semantic scholar, you see how many people have build on this, it is a huge topic. |
Citation: Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 174–215. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174]
A standardized set of 260 pictures, black and white.
PDF accesible via: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174
Important: APA does not own the distribution rights to the 260 picture stimuli in Appendix A.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: