diff --git a/architecture-decision-records/010-greenhouse-workspace-tools.md b/architecture-decision-records/010-greenhouse-workspace-tools.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2d0cd80 --- /dev/null +++ b/architecture-decision-records/010-greenhouse-workspace-tools.md @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ +# 010-greenhouse-workstation-tools + +- Status: [draft] +- Deciders: [HGW, Esther, Uwe] +- Date: [YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated] +- Tags: [greenhouse / cloudoperators] +- Technical Story: [description | ticket/issue URL] + +## Context and Problem Statement + +Provide Greenhouse operators with pre-authenticated, pre-installed CLI like hammer/screw, openstackcli, kubectl, spore, vault, u8s. +Have some sort of startup logon script that scopes the user to the correct project and region. (like `setpw` on jumphost) + +## Decision Drivers + +- [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …] +- [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …] +- … + +## Considered Options + +- [option 1] +- [option 2] +- [option 3] +- … + +## Decision Outcome + +Chosen option: "[option 1]", +because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)]. + +### Positive Consequences + +- [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …] +- … + +### Negative Consequences + +- [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …] +- … + +## Pros and Cons of the Options | Evaluation of options + +### [option 1] + +[example | description | pointer to more information | …] + +| Decision Driver | Rating | Reason | +|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------| +| [decision driver a] | +++ | Good, because [argument a] | | +| [decision driver b] | --- | Good, because [argument b] | +| [decision driver c] | -- | Bad, because [argument c] | +| [decision driver d] | o | Neutral, because [argument d] | + +### [option 2] + +[example | description | pointer to more information | …] + +| Decision Driver | Rating | Reason | +|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------| +| [decision driver a] | +++ | Good, because [argument a] | | +| [decision driver b] | --- | Good, because [argument b] | +| [decision driver c] | -- | Bad, because [argument c] | +| [decision driver d] | o | Neutral, because [argument d] | + +### [option 3] + +[example | description | pointer to more information | …] + +| Decision Driver | Rating | Reason | +|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------| +| [decision driver a] | +++ | Good, because [argument a] | | +| [decision driver b] | --- | Good, because [argument b] | +| [decision driver c] | -- | Bad, because [argument c] | +| [decision driver d] | o | Neutral, because [argument d] | + +## Related Decision Records + +[previous decision record, e.g., an ADR, which is solved by this one | next decision record, e.g., an ADR, which solves this one | … | pointer to more information] + +## Links + +- [Link type](link to adr) +- …