You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 9, 2021. It is now read-only.
Think about/do something about quality scoring of root checklists. Possible scale:
a. ENDORSED -by recognised authorative body governmental /NGO /Prof. Body e.g. WHO, NIH, NICE, etc.
b. PEER REVIEWED - Has been published in a recognised peer reviewed journal or subject to some other form of peer review e.g by a particular hospital or institution
c. PUBLISHED - Anything else intended for live use which is not a or b above
d. IN PREPERATION – Material published for comment, but not yet intended for live use
e. TEST – Test material published for software testing purposes only
But urgently segregate stuff intended for use from stuff which is not at or never intended to get to that stage.
You might also want to think about some form of crowd sourced quality ranking as well as or instead of the above – I would say as well as.
from Ewan Davis
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Think about/do something about quality scoring of root checklists. Possible scale:
a. ENDORSED -by recognised authorative body governmental /NGO /Prof. Body e.g. WHO, NIH, NICE, etc.
b. PEER REVIEWED - Has been published in a recognised peer reviewed journal or subject to some other form of peer review e.g by a particular hospital or institution
c. PUBLISHED - Anything else intended for live use which is not a or b above
d. IN PREPERATION – Material published for comment, but not yet intended for live use
e. TEST – Test material published for software testing purposes only
But urgently segregate stuff intended for use from stuff which is not at or never intended to get to that stage.
You might also want to think about some form of crowd sourced quality ranking as well as or instead of the above – I would say as well as.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: