You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Why not "automatically" generate the results
for these top 6 dependent variables?.
Easy and useful shortcut! :-)
The new, suggested Function: explain()
where the default is: show only the 6 TOP vars,
The user can specify any other # of top vars to show,
ie: explain(3) to show the 3 top vars, or explain(+3) to show the 3 top positively-correlated vars, or explain(-3) to show the 3 top negatively-correlated vars
Love to see this explain() Fx in correlationFunnel! :-) THANKS, MATT! great job!.
Sfd99
San Francisco
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
sfd99
changed the title
Feature Request for CorrelaionFunnel: automate with new explain() Fx
Feature Request for CorrelationFunnel: automate with new explain() Fx
Aug 9, 2019
Great and
very clear stepXstep package tutorial, Matt!.
A time-saving suggestion (if I may):
in Step:
"Examining the Results" (after Step 3),
where you have:
marketing_campaign_correlated_tbl %>%
filter(feature %in% c("DURATION", "POUTCOME", "PDAYS",
"PREVIOUS", "CONTACT", "HOUSING")) %>%
plot_correlation_funnel(interactive = FALSE, limits = c(-0.4, 0.4))
Why not "automatically" generate the results
for these top 6 dependent variables?.
Easy and useful shortcut! :-)
The new, suggested Function:
explain()
where the default is: show only the 6 TOP vars,
The user can specify any other # of top vars to show,
ie:
explain(3) to show the 3 top vars, or
explain(+3) to show the 3 top positively-correlated vars, or
explain(-3) to show the 3 top negatively-correlated vars
Love to see this explain() Fx in correlationFunnel! :-)
THANKS, MATT! great job!.
Sfd99
San Francisco
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: