Article with Featured " No " has active featuring date

[chmst]

Steps to reproduce the issue

If an article is not featured, the input fields for featuring dates are confusing.

Expected result

Input fields for dates are hidden

Actual result

System information (as much as possible)

Additional comments

[HLeithner]

We should move this to the publishing tab and remove the "on show feature"

[chmst]

Not sure about this. It is an attribute of the article not of the transition.

[HLeithner]

It is a publishing option and should not be at this position at all, in my optionen 'featured' should be at the publishing tab too

[HLeithner]

And featuring date it self has not much todo if it's on or off

[chmst]

you are right, I misunderstood your remark

[chmst]

I suggest another solution. You are right, that featured_up /_ down should be on the publishing tab. BUT the the whole thing then is useless because users will not take notice of this new function.

As we must choose between correct and userfriendly
I suggest a javascipt which performs she showon.

[HLeithner]

onshow is already javascript but there is no reason why featured_up/down is handled differently then publish_up/down. Always showing it is the best option and should belong to the publish tab.

[chmst]

There is a reason why the fields are handled differently:

publish_up and publish_down are always valid.
feature_up and feature_down make sense only when featured is "on".

Showing the input fields when the swith is "off" is always wrong, no matter on which tab.
Changing the position of the fields is simple but unfortunately does not resolve the problem

[HLeithner]

That's not true, publish_up/down required state to be published and feature_up/down required featured to be yes so it's exactly the same.