New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Track] Node-gyp sucks #158
Comments
Nice issue and totally agree on it, I'm also bothered as hell concerning The thoughts i've had so far:
The thing now is to to weigh the pros and cons of this change, as |
Keep having newcomers that are somewhat blocked at the very init step, which is not acceptable. Solution for now:
We should apply this quickly in a v2.4 release, while shifting the current planned features/issues in the 2.5. |
node-gyp
sucksMultiple reasons to refractor the app and remove
node-gyp
:better-sqlite3
package relies onnode-gyp
which makes it not usable with Bun at all.Possible solutions
Aside from my rant, the solutions I looked up were:
better-sqlite3
when in an Node environment (which is hard to detect, see no. 7 above) because, well, it worksbun:sqlite
module when in a Bun environmentCounter-arguments to what I just said
See "Bun hype. How we learned nothing from Yarn"
v1
was released@barthofu do what you want with this issue mate, maybe we can make it an actual tracker (and also remove the bug tag pls 👍)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: