Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Separate MemoryStorageClient and FilesystemStorageClient #92

Open
vdusek opened this issue Apr 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Separate MemoryStorageClient and FilesystemStorageClient #92

vdusek opened this issue Apr 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@vdusek
Labels
enhancement New feature or request. t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team.

Comments

@vdusek
Copy link
Collaborator

vdusek commented Apr 5, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Description

Currently, we have a MemoryStorageClient, that can persist the data in the file system.

Let's separate them, FilesystemStorageClient could probably extend MemoryStorageClient

Other related things

  • There are memory storage-only data models in the storage/models.py module. Move them to the memory storage subpackage.
@vdusek vdusek added enhancement New feature or request. t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team. labels Apr 5, 2024
@vdusek vdusek mentioned this issue Apr 5, 2024
Closed
@vdusek vdusek added this to the 0.2 milestone Jun 10, 2024
@vdusek vdusek removed this from the v0.2 milestone Jul 15, 2024
@janbuchar janbuchar mentioned this issue Nov 15, 2024
Open
@vdusek vdusek self-assigned this Jan 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@vdusek vdusek

Labels
enhancement New feature or request. t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@vdusek