You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So I didn't even know there was a maintainer check, it's good, but b/c it removes the packages rather than stepping over and flagging, I had no idea some of my packages where removed and not receiving their updates. Because of this, I have disabled the maintainer check. Unfortunately I understand there isn't a good way to make a warning during 'pacman -Syu', but removing without prompting the user I dont feel is the best way to do it. Perhaps another list, disabled_packages, could be created? Then when it's populated aurto commands could warn about disabled packages and status could tell what they are.
/etc/aurto/{maintainers,disabled_packages}
Disabled packages: enable by adding them again
google-chrome
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes packages from untrusted maintainers are removed from the aurto repo. There'll be a warning in the log. As you say you can disable these checks.
After removal the repoless package will also turn up in pacman -Qm queries, which if you are using repos for all aur packages will usually be empty.
That's how i manage it, i have some check to ensure there are no repoless packages. Actually the same problem can come from the official repos E.g. they can remove a package that was installed and one of the only ways you can only know about it is running pacman -Qm. So this strategy covers both.
Perhaps there are other ways we could also notify the user. A log of removed packages is one, but in a way we have that already as it is possible to scan the journal logs. I also considered having opt in desktop notifications, but I'm unsure if that'll actually be useful for most users.
I could also add the existing strategies to the readme or wiki. Would that have been helpful?
I hadn't thought about Qm, thank you. However I think maintaining a simple list would be beneficial. If this process isn't in the readme/wiki it should be and probably in the short section of the how to use/install section. However I doubt I would have taken the time to read it outside the installation/usage section.
# list disabled during status
if [ -s /etc/aurto/disabled_packages ];then
echo "Disabled package: add again to enable"
cat /etc/aurto/disabled_packages
fi
# remove package
echo "${package}" >> /etc/aurto/disabled_packages
# remove during add package
sed "/${package}/d" /etc/aurto/disabled_packages
So I didn't even know there was a maintainer check, it's good, but b/c it removes the packages rather than stepping over and flagging, I had no idea some of my packages where removed and not receiving their updates. Because of this, I have disabled the maintainer check. Unfortunately I understand there isn't a good way to make a warning during 'pacman -Syu', but removing without prompting the user I dont feel is the best way to do it. Perhaps another list, disabled_packages, could be created? Then when it's populated aurto commands could warn about disabled packages and status could tell what they are.
/etc/aurto/{maintainers,disabled_packages}
Disabled packages: enable by adding them again
google-chrome
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: