Repository for my MSc thesis
sudo apt install texlive-full
latexmk
- gather identifiers from gnu using regexr
week 22 stage 1
week 23 stage 2
week 24 stage 2
week 26 stage 3
week 27 - 32 vacay
week 33 results
week 34 discussion
week 35 conclusions
week 36 send first draft, wait for comments, revise
week 37 send final draft, wait for final comments, revise
week 38 read final comments, student sends final version, supervisor requests review
week 39 wait for review
week 40 wait for review
week 41:
mon: supervisor sends thesis to grappa
wed: student submits thesis to E-thesis
- setting
- definition
- problem
- easier sub-problem
- thesis' contribution
- primary object of this research (rqs)
- 1.2 will examine terms
- viewpoints
- thesis structure
- state of current terminology
- terms of other interest areas of the thesis
- why the scope is so narrow
- acknowledge some other essential but non-focus
- state of terminology standardization
- figure to demonstrate terms
- free vs open
- define PCLs in se
- acknowledge the topic is complex
- aim of the chapter
- explain slr
- study follows kitchenham 2007
- how the review process came to be
- reliability & validity
- purpose of rqs
- aim of individual rqs
- where was search process conducted in (inclusion/exclusion in appendix a)
- data extraction process
- more on where was search process conducted in
- how were search terms determined (end condition)
- search string
- how many results
- finalized search string
- Study selection divided into multiple stages (figure)
- first stage titles, abstracts and keywords
- second stage inclusion exclusion criteria (quality assesment incl/excl, manual excl in appendix b)
- third stage manual review (final list of licenses in appendix c (maybe in hosted javascript githubpages as well))
- inclusion criterias (second phase from github /licenses api)
- exclusion criterias
- comments on applying
- quality criteria was also taken into consideration
- quality criteria
- quality assesment and figure
- what was done to answer rq (table data extraction form)
- aim of scope and evidence levels (alves et al)
- categorization of results
- next chapter presents outcomes
- information about chapter
- how many licenses and why
- statistical overview with figures (mapping study)
- how many licenses during each stage (figure)
- basic statistic on final licenses (figure)
- essential statistics (figure)
- figures and study identifier tables
- figures and study identifier tables
- figures and study identifier tables
- indications
- follow-up observation
- observation 1
- observation 2
- sum-up from those two
- how to improve scientific scene 1
- how to improve scientific scene 2
- how to improve scientific scene 3
- how to improve professional scene 1
- how to improve professional scene 2
- how to improve professional scene 3
- overall
- major limitation
- possible threats to validity
- efforts to inclusion
- as with all slr all licenses cannot be reviewed manually
- license selection was done in sufficient manner
- importance of data extraction
- lack of measurements and tooling
- primary objective of this study
- conclusions from each rq
- adopting a clear baseline
- Docker CLA, SSPL
- make cla easier maybe with gpg
- LICENSE highlighting.js
- what kind of efforts and why
- what this thesis has provided
- how has each license fared in the court in real life?