Are the Figure Numbers for 3.13-3.24 incorrect? #80
Comments
RobRoseKnows
added a commit
to RobRoseKnows/aima-pseudocode
that referenced
this issue
Mar 21, 2018
- As described in Issue aimacode#80 - Figure numbers don't match textbook and `aima-python` codebase - Figures 3.13, 3.16 & 3.17 needed be increased by one - Figure 3.24 needed to be increased by two. - New Figure Numbers are 3.14, 3.17, 3.18 and 3.24. - Only needed to change README.md
RobRoseKnows
added a commit
to RobRoseKnows/aima-pseudocode
that referenced
this issue
Mar 21, 2018
- As described in Issue aimacode#80 - Figure numbers don't match textbook and `aima-python` codebase - Figures 3.13, 3.16 & 3.17 needed be increased by one - Figure 3.24 needed to be increased by two. - New Figure Numbers are 3.14, 3.17, 3.18 and 3.26. - Only needed to change README.md
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I was writing a GSoC proposal and I was looking at the Uniform Cost Search pseudocode. However the figure numbers for it and onward are one less than they are in my 3rd Edition textbook (3.24 is actually two less) and in the
aima-pythondocstrings. Were figures removed in a different printing or were they transcribed incorrectly?Either way, I'm going to submit a PR to fix the Figure numbers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: