-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Can new starter workflows for static page generators still be considered? #2247
Comments
I came here for exactly the same thing;) The actions available elsewhere still use the classic branch deploys and there's really no good example of building straight to the deployment environment, and MkDocs builds could really benefit from this addition here. |
Based on the PR template does it seem like they only accept scan/CI-based actions right now, which is kind of sad, because MkDocs is certainly amongst the more popular static site generators and many people could benefit from this addition for sure... But unless there will be a change to the current status is this unfortunately nothing we can change here... Unless we hold our own collection of starter workflows people could copy-paste. |
According to the contributing file is this repository as of right now only accepting new workflows for code scanning.
With that said would I still like to ask, if there is a chance to still get a starter workflow added for a static site generator.
The SSG in question I want to contribute a workflow file for is MkDocs, which is one of the more popular SSG and having a starter workflow for it could help people setting up a proper workflow for publishing to GitHub pages.
I can understand if you stay firm in your decision on only accepting new workflows for code scanning, but hope it can be considered.
I appreciate a quick response.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: