Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 14, 2023. It is now read-only.

Not compatible with the latest @fullcalendar/core #957

Open
rohanrajpal opened this issue Jun 4, 2023 · 7 comments
Open

Not compatible with the latest @fullcalendar/core #957

rohanrajpal opened this issue Jun 4, 2023 · 7 comments

Comments

@rohanrajpal
Copy link

Hey, thanks for working on this wrapper! I just installed and stumbled upon this

apps/client
└─┬ svelte-fullcalendar 2.0.0-beta.0
  └── ✕ unmet peer @fullcalendar/core@^5.0.0: found 6.1.8

I do see some dependency dashboard tickets but didnt found this particular one, hence creating one

@God-lives
Copy link

God-lives commented Jul 1, 2023

i agree.. I feel like I've found an oasis in the desert. Please provide me with more upgrades for sveltefullcalendar.

@rakuzen25
Copy link

@rohanrajpal I haven't tried it, but does v6 work? If the API interface didn't change I suppose it's just bumping the peer dependency version, otherwise it may actually require some refactoring…

@tclass
Copy link

tclass commented Sep 13, 2023

did anyone make it work? Which versions should work together?

@tclass
Copy link

tclass commented Sep 14, 2023

After digging a bit I found that this is already fixed here, #934 but I think that the NPM lib wasn't update only the PR was merged. @YogliB would it be possible to update the lib on npm?

@YogliB
Copy link
Owner

YogliB commented Sep 14, 2023

Hey @tclass , I'll publish a new version later today

@tclass
Copy link

tclass commented Sep 14, 2023

@YogliB Thank you so much, that was fast 🥇 👍🏻

@YogliB
Copy link
Owner

YogliB commented Sep 14, 2023

I published the latest version, but it will probably be the last, and you're better off using the native full-calendar library.
I'm archiving this repo as I no longer maintain it and no one seems to want to take it on...

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants