From f2cdbf0cf407dd857f18d9623b8d694bb75dd82e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: hxh0928 <137586273+hxh0928@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 19:18:35 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Update README.md

---
 README.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index d013eae..300e53b 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 # Benchmarking Mendelian Randomization methods for causal inference using genome‐wide association study summary statistics
 ## The experimental design for benchmarking MR methods
 We present a benchmarking analysis of MR methods for causal inference with real-world genetic datasets. Our focus is on MR methods that utilize GWAS summary statistics as input, as they do not require access to individual-level GWAS data and are widely applicable. Specifically, we consider 15 MR methods, including the standard IVW (fixed) and IVW (random) and 13 other advanced MR methods: Egger, RAPS,  Weighted-median, Weighted-mode, MR-PRESSO, MRMix, cML-MA, MR-Robust, MR-Lasso, MR-CUE, CAUSE, MRAPSS and MR-ConMix (Figure A). The procedure for running the MR methods is outlined in Figure B.  To assess the performance of these MR methods, we utilized real-world datasets and focused on three key aspects: type I error control, the accuracy of causal effect estimates, replicability and power (Figure C).
-![My Image]()
+![My Image](design.png)
 ## Datasets
 The five datasets used in the MR benchmarking study can be downloaded here.