Explore TOML support

[adamziel]

JSON is a great data format, but lack of multiline strings can make writing Blueprints in it annoying. TOML seems like a reasonable alternative that supports multiline strings, has a less verbose syntax, and none of the YAML downsides (ambiguity, refs). Perhaps we could easily support both in the medium term?

cc @dmsnell @brandonpayton @juanmagarrido

[flexseth]

+1!

Supports

• Blueprint meta: Add "More Information" type field blueprints#43

Love the idea of making blueprints more verbose!

[brandonpayton]

This sounds like a great idea!

If we don't have a more intelligent way of discerning between the two, is there any reason we shouldn't try parsing as JSON first and fall back to TOML?