Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Major problems Microsoft LSASS engine #902

Open
snap254 opened this issue Mar 12, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Major problems Microsoft LSASS engine #902

snap254 opened this issue Mar 12, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@snap254
Copy link

snap254 commented Mar 12, 2020

We noticed that there is a HUGE increase in CPU for the "lsass.exe" engine on a Windows host server running Windows Auth operations via WAFFLE in our Java app. Under enough pressure - this service will crash and effectively kill the entire host server - requiring a reboot.

We know LSASS (Local Security Authority Process) is part of the Kerberos infrastructure on a Windows Machine. But, when we pump a .Net application via IIS and Windows Auth, we do not see the same LSASS response.

First, has anyone seen this before? Second, is this to be expected using WAFFLE or anything else? Third, is there any obvious steps we can take to mitigate the problem?

thx
in advance

@hazendaz
Copy link
Member

hazendaz commented Mar 12, 2020 via email

@snap254
Copy link
Author

snap254 commented Mar 12, 2020

We're currently using 1.8.3. I believe that issues with LSASS were addressed in 1.8.0 and we can upgrade to the latest version 2. But we did not see anything in the release notes since 1.8.3 that addresses any other problems with LSASS, so its not something we have actively pursued.

Should we?

@snap254
Copy link
Author

snap254 commented Mar 12, 2020

PS: We're running Java 11 on Windows 2016 Standard.

@hazendaz
Copy link
Member

@snap254 I would suggest upgrading to latest. Waffle is on top of JNA and a lot has changed with that since 2017. I haven't seen any other reports that I recall on this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants