You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
BTCSQ blocks have the PoW reward as the last output
It looks as if third parties (ChainZ / Miningpoolstats) use the first output to recognise who / which pool found that block. But in the case of BTCSQ this results in showing the address of a random PoP miner (the one who first appears in the list sorted by address it seems)
Not sure if there is an official convention but for other blockchains usually blocks have the PoW reward as the first output.
I guess in theory every miner can order the outputs added to a block in the order as he likes but assuming almost everyone will go with the default functionality it would be great if by default the output order has the PoW reward as the first output.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Output order is not strictly defined. Our pool adds POW payout as last payout, whereas generatetoaddress in BTCSQd as first. If we limit to either variant, then it means a hard fork in BTCSQ... Not sure it is worth it.
BTCSQ blocks have the PoW reward as the last output
It looks as if third parties (ChainZ / Miningpoolstats) use the first output to recognise who / which pool found that block. But in the case of BTCSQ this results in showing the address of a random PoP miner (the one who first appears in the list sorted by address it seems)
Not sure if there is an official convention but for other blockchains usually blocks have the PoW reward as the first output.
I guess in theory every miner can order the outputs added to a block in the order as he likes but assuming almost everyone will go with the default functionality it would be great if by default the output order has the PoW reward as the first output.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: