Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Is the transitive contrast generation the best way to generate the joint estimands? #104

Open
olivierlabayle opened this issue Feb 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Is the transitive contrast generation the best way to generate the joint estimands? #104

olivierlabayle opened this issue Feb 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@olivierlabayle
Copy link
Member

Assuming freq(A) > freq(B) > freq(C):

We are currently doing: A --> B, B --> C.

We could do: A --> B, A --> C.

Since A has more cases than B, it may result in better estimation. Is this approach sufficient to cover all linear combinations?
@olivierlabayle olivierlabayle added enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested labels Feb 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@olivierlabayle