Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ComposedEstimands shouldn't take a function #102

Open
olivierlabayle opened this issue Jan 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

ComposedEstimands shouldn't take a function #102

olivierlabayle opened this issue Jan 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@olivierlabayle
Copy link
Member

At the moment ComposedEstimands are defined by a function which means only one function can be applied to the joint. I think we should always take the joint distribution and later potentially evaluate any function on it.

!! Breaking (again)
@olivierlabayle olivierlabayle added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 27, 2024
@olivierlabayle
Copy link
Member Author

olivierlabayle commented May 24, 2024 •
edited
Loading

  • Split into JointEstimand / ComposedEstimand and estimates
  • add dict conversion (maybe check the Configurations.jl advancement)
  • Make sure the jointEstimand can be passed to hotelling test

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@olivierlabayle