You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have a wild mix between using physfsutil for tasks and raw PHYSFS_-prefixed functions.
It would be great if all the relevant functions could be moved into physfsutil. That makes it much easier in case of API changes because we only need to update the relevant parts in the PhysfsUtil class.
As PhysFS is moving beyond 2.0 into 3.0 territory with API changes...well...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
tobbi
changed the title
Move PhysFS functions into PhysfsUtil
Move PhysFS functions into PhysfsUtil and rely on PhysFSUtil more
Apr 2, 2024
Most times I've looked at parts of the code that perform PhysFS operations, I have thought the same... physfsutil should be more widely used as a wrapper throughout the source indeed.
We have a wild mix between using physfsutil for tasks and raw PHYSFS_-prefixed functions.
It would be great if all the relevant functions could be moved into physfsutil. That makes it much easier in case of API changes because we only need to update the relevant parts in the PhysfsUtil class.
As PhysFS is moving beyond 2.0 into 3.0 territory with API changes...well...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: