We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Seems that the NX CI access token is included in nx.json: https://github.com/SAP/open-ux-tools/blob/main/nx.json
"accessToken": "ZjFiYzA4OTYtYjFlNS00NTI2LTk4OTktNWZiYTAyMGE0ZGRmfHJlYWQtd3JpdGU=",
This is considered legacy by NX: https://nx.dev/ci/recipes/security/access-tokens
"We do not recommend that you commit an access token to your repository but older versions of Nx do support this"
Why not use secrets and put the token there? Seems that the token used in a read/write token: f1bc0896-b1e5-4526-9899-5fba020a4ddf|read-write
The NX documentation cited above states additional recommendation for a read/write token.
In case the token is still used: why not follow the NX recommendations? If not used: why not remove it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks. Investigating.
Sorry, something went wrong.
devinea
No branches or pull requests
Seems that the NX CI access token is included in nx.json: https://github.com/SAP/open-ux-tools/blob/main/nx.json
"accessToken": "ZjFiYzA4OTYtYjFlNS00NTI2LTk4OTktNWZiYTAyMGE0ZGRmfHJlYWQtd3JpdGU=",
This is considered legacy by NX: https://nx.dev/ci/recipes/security/access-tokens
"We do not recommend that you commit an access token to your repository but older versions of Nx do support this"
Why not use secrets and put the token there? Seems that the token used in a read/write token:
f1bc0896-b1e5-4526-9899-5fba020a4ddf|read-write
The NX documentation cited above states additional recommendation for a read/write token.
In case the token is still used: why not follow the NX recommendations?
If not used: why not remove it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: