Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

use return type single instead of observable #165

Open
geonu1109 opened this issue Mar 2, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

use return type single instead of observable #165

geonu1109 opened this issue Mar 2, 2020 · 1 comment
Projects
RxAlamofire 6.0.0

Comments

@geonu1109
Copy link
Member

Requests using alamofire emit a response only once.
So, I think single is better than observable for it's return type.
@geonu1109 geonu1109 linked a pull request Mar 2, 2020 that will close this issue
use return type single instead of observable #166
Closed
@rynecheow rynecheow added this to To do in RxAlamofire 6.0.0 via automation May 26, 2020
@hoc081098
Copy link

anything new?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
RxAlamofire 6.0.0
  
To do
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

use return type single instead of observable geonu1109/RxAlamofire
2 participants
@geonu1109 @hoc081098