You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On 27 Jul 2017, at 14:32, Manuel Holtgrewe wrote:
Looks interesting, although the focus of Ontolib ist narrower. Our
main use case is in supporting ontology similarity searches.
I see. The benefit for you is less as you have already implemented an
obo parser, but one of the goals is to prevent people having to do this
(you actually did this in a robust fashion with a grammar, but most
people use regexes that break).
I had no success finding the big ontologies on obofoundry in this
format, so far. Could you point me there?
OBO Format is legacy, this is the replacement: https://github.com/geneontology/obographs/
For context: https://douroucouli.wordpress.com/2016/10/04/a-developer-friendly-json-exchange-format-for-ontologies/
It should be much easier to support this than the existing obo parser here:
https://github.com/Phenomics/ontolib/tree/master/ontolib-io/src/main/antlr4/de/charite/compbio/ontolib/io/obo/parser
No antlr grammar required, it's just json
Note: once you have implemented this you automatically have OWL support too, if you add the obographs jar
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: