-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 108
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Question about reader_netCDF_CF_unstructured.py #1287
Comments
I think I made this change because siglay was for face_variables and siglev was for node variables, otherwise the dimensions did not match up. But it has been a while since I did this. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I have some questions about reader_netCDF_CF_unstructured.py code.
If you look at the get_variable function, there is a slight difference between node_variable and face_variable in the part that fetches the data at the closest point to the particle position.
The node_variables says to extract the required data using sigma_ind when dvar.dimensions has 'siglev'.
On the other hand, face_variables use sigma_ind to extract data when 'siglay' is in the variable dimension.
In my opinion, if node_variables, face_variables, or depth dimensions exist, they can all use 'siglay' the same, but what made them set them differently? Is there any special reason?
face_variable interpolating
node_variable interpolating
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: