You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Here are the results of using different normalization on the decoder.
By the computation operation of the normalization methods, the MUNIT architecture can be summarized as follows.
This means that since there's no tuning channel correlation on the upsampling layer (i.e., Adaptive Instance Normalization, StyleGAN), if you use instance normalization during upsampling, the tunned channel correlation (ResNet + Adaptive Instance Normalization) will be destroyed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
tom99763
changed the title
Experiment of using Instance Normalization vs Layer Normalization on the Decoder
Experiment of using Instance Normalization vs Layer Normalization on the Decoder (MUNIT)
Nov 12, 2022
Here are the results of using different normalization on the decoder.
By the computation operation of the normalization methods, the MUNIT architecture can be summarized as follows.
This means that since there's no tuning channel correlation on the upsampling layer (i.e., Adaptive Instance Normalization, StyleGAN), if you use instance normalization during upsampling, the tunned channel correlation (ResNet + Adaptive Instance Normalization) will be destroyed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: