You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
noticing a challenge here. while building out the logic that converts a RouteE route to a HIVE route, i thought about the energy modeling. it seems like our goal should be to let RouteE Powertrain do the energy simulation in HIVE. when we compute a route, we get that information in the RouteE route. however, HIVE expects us to report energy via the Mechatronics interface. so, when we compute a route via the route method on a RoadNetwork, all we get back is a route, which is a list of LinkTraversal records:
nowhere to stash energy information here. probably a good idea too. but does this mean we need to load RouteE Powertrain as a Mechatronics provider? that's probably the right idea. this also creates an opportunity for human error if there is a mismatch between the models used in Compass vs Powertrain.
RouteE Compass can be an optional dependency for HIVE and used in-the-loop as the road network during simulation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: