Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement Average Headmodel #2

Open
neurofractal opened this issue Apr 25, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Implement Average Headmodel #2

neurofractal opened this issue Apr 25, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request test

Comments

@neurofractal
Copy link
Contributor

" The averaged rank pseudo MRI [PSM(AR,n), PHM(AR,n, Equation 6] was the average of first n rank pseudo MRIs [PSMi,rank=1 to n and PHMi, rank=1 to n, models are in the head coordinate system (BTi coordinate) after the ICP registration process] for a given subject. An averaged sourcemodel was directly computed by taking the centroid of the particular source grid point location (r) of first n rank pseudo sourcemodels (Equation 6a)."

Gohel et al., (2017)

Therefore need to load pre-computed headmodel and average (?) over first n iterations

@neurofractal neurofractal self-assigned this Apr 25, 2018
@neurofractal neurofractal added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 25, 2018
neurofractal added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 30, 2018
Addresses #2

- Averages the headmodel and sourcemodel over the best 20 fitting MRIs
(ie. least error)
- Seems to work.. visual gamma is localised correctly
- Can we ‘average’ over the meshes for visualisation purposes?
- Could be make it less computationally demanding?
- Is 20 the optimal number (as according to Gohel et al, 2017 paper)
- Obviously we can’t produce a warped ‘average’ MRI.. Is there are way
around this? Could we ‘average’ the transform matrices? IDK..
@neurofractal
Copy link
Contributor Author

We probably need to test whether n=20 averages is the optimal (like for Gohel et al., 2017)

@neurofractal
Copy link
Contributor Author

neurofractal commented Dec 5, 2018

Works well... but needs more testing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request test
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant