You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
" The averaged rank pseudo MRI [PSM(AR,n), PHM(AR,n, Equation 6] was the average of first n rank pseudo MRIs [PSMi,rank=1 to n and PHMi, rank=1 to n, models are in the head coordinate system (BTi coordinate) after the ICP registration process] for a given subject. An averaged sourcemodel was directly computed by taking the centroid of the particular source grid point location (r) of first n rank pseudo sourcemodels (Equation 6a)."
Gohel et al., (2017)
Therefore need to load pre-computed headmodel and average (?) over first n iterations
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Addresses #2
- Averages the headmodel and sourcemodel over the best 20 fitting MRIs
(ie. least error)
- Seems to work.. visual gamma is localised correctly
- Can we ‘average’ over the meshes for visualisation purposes?
- Could be make it less computationally demanding?
- Is 20 the optimal number (as according to Gohel et al, 2017 paper)
- Obviously we can’t produce a warped ‘average’ MRI.. Is there are way
around this? Could we ‘average’ the transform matrices? IDK..
" The averaged rank pseudo MRI [PSM(AR,n), PHM(AR,n, Equation 6] was the average of first n rank pseudo MRIs [PSMi,rank=1 to n and PHMi, rank=1 to n, models are in the head coordinate system (BTi coordinate) after the ICP registration process] for a given subject. An averaged sourcemodel was directly computed by taking the centroid of the particular source grid point location (r) of first n rank pseudo sourcemodels (Equation 6a)."
Gohel et al., (2017)
Therefore need to load pre-computed headmodel and average (?) over first n iterations
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: